Working papers
URI permanente para esta colecciónhttps://publicaciones.dejusticia.org/handle/dejusticia/23
Examinar
3 resultados
Resultados de la búsqueda
Publicación Summary: Protecting Human Rights on the Ground. Case Studies on the Origin and Development of OHCHR Country Offices and their Relevance for the Situation in VenezuelaLigia Bolívar Osuna; Lucía Ramírez BolívarThe following is a summary of the findings and conclusions of a comparative study regarding OHCHR country offices in four locations (Cambodia, Colombia, Guatemala and Tunisia). The study ultimately aims to generate reflections derived from these comparative experiences for the case of Venezuela. The study’s methodology included document review and conducting interviews with around 60 officials and former officials of OHCHR, human rights defenders from the four countries studied and from Venezuela, representatives of international human rights NGOs, officials of the United Nations system with knowledge of the situation in Venezuela and former officials of public institutions of the countries studiedPublicación Protecting Human Rights on the Ground. Case Studies on the Origin and Development of OHCHR Country Offices and their Relevance for the Situation in VenezuelaLigia Bolívar Osuna; Lucía Ramírez BolívarDuring the investigation, the presence of OHCHR completed its first six months in Venezuela, so a consultation with human rights defenders in the country was included to assess this experience. Being the first comparative research in this field, its findings are equally of interest to other audiences beyond Venezuela. Following the proposal to create in Venezuela a country office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the need arises to explore some experiences that can provide insights to those who, from civil society in general and the human rights movement in particular, have an interest in promoting a process of greater presence and monitoring by the international human rights system in Venezuela, so that this process is the product of informed and strategically considered decisions. This study identifies processes, strategies, lessons and practices that may or may not be applicable to the situation in Venezuela, based on a comparative analysis of the experience of four OHCHR country offices with different characteristics and contexts, but with elements of interest for the Venezuelan case: Cambodia, Colombia, Guatemala and Tunisia. The purpose is to provide elements to the national human rights movement and other interested parties in Venezuela, for the design of a realistic and coordinated advocacy strategy against the different actors involved: the UN human rights system, government, other interested States and donors. During the investigation, the presence of OHCHR completed its first six months in Venezuela, so a consultation with human rights defenders in the country was included to assess this experience. Being the first comparative research in this field, its findings are equally of interest to other audiences beyond Venezuela.Publicación Fraught with Pain: Access to Palliative Care and Treatment for Heroin Use Disorder in ColombiaIsabel Pereira-Arana; Lucía Ramírez BolívarThis books seeks to facilitate linkages between discussions on the right to health and discussions on drug policy reform. The populations we talk about here are the noes most in need of a change whereby drug culture measures cease to stand in the way of a life free from pain. The suffering and pain experienced by people with terminal illnesses and people with heroin use disorder can be alleviated through opioids. At the same time, the enforcement of international drug control treaties means that these medicines are subjected to strict controls that create excessive red tape and contribute to generalized fear among patients and health professionals concerning these medicines’ use. Although many opioids are included in the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines, the fact that they are controlled substances means that in practice, the right to health of these two populations often is violated. Fraught with Pain offers a diagnosis of five Colombian cities with regard to the barrieres that both populations—patients at the end of life and individuals with heroin use disorder—face when trying to access opioids. The hurdles they encounter can be grouped into four categories: 1. Structural failings of the Colombian health system 2. A lack of institutional capacity to mantain sufficient opioid stocks in small and medium cities 3. A lack of specialized training among health professionals in small and medium cities on the issues of palliative care and psychoactive substance use disorders 4. Stigma surrounding opioids and the people who use them Analyzing the enjoyment of the right to health among these two groups of people would seem ill advised, for what could they and the health care they receive possibly have in common? However, this book argues that someone facing the end of life and someone with a heroin use disorder actually face similar challenges: they are both in need of the same controlled substances; they both require interdisciplinary treatment that extendes beyond opioids; they both seek health services during moments of extreme vulnerability; and they are both often treated negligently by health systems that are ill equipped to handle death and drug dependence. Fraught with Pain seeks to facilitate linkages between discussions on the right to health and discussions on drug policy reform. The populations we talk about here are the noes most in need of a change whereby drug culture measures cease to stand in the way of a life free from pain. Descripción tomada de: https://www.dejusticia.org/en/publication/fraught-with-pain-access-to-palliative-care-and-treatment-for-heroin-use-disorder-in-colombia/